Store withdraws chocolate ducklings over racism complaint prepossessionary

The 'Waitrose Trio of Chocolate Easter Ducklings' contains a white, milk and dark chocolate version, which were named 'Fluffy,' 'Crispy' and 'Ugly' respectively.

A Twitter user questioned why Waitrose had chosen to call the darkest duckling 'Ugly.'

'Overheard women saying 'this is not right,' I agree, doesn't look good at all,' wrote Livia A. Aliberti on March 7.



https://cde.instructure.com/eportfolios/285257/Home/DownloadMp3_Verschiedene_Interpreten__KuschelRock_Best_of_Vol_Album_Download
https://cde.instructure.com/eportfolios/285261/Home/DOWNLOAD_ALBUM_Verschiedene_Interpreten__Summerfield_Records_prse_Zip_Mp3
https://cde.instructure.com/eportfolios/285260/Home/DOWNLOAD_ALBUM_Ruphus__New_Born_Day_Zip_Mp3


Waitrose has since apologized in a short statement seen by CNN.

'We are very sorry for any upset caused by the name of this product, it was absolutely not our intention to cause any offence,' reads the statement.

'We removed the product from sale several weeks ago while we changed the labeling and our ducklings are now back on sale.'

One possible explanation for the naming is a reference to the Hans Christian Andersen fairytale 'The Ugly Duckling.'

The story features an unfortunate young duckling who is bullied by all of those around him before turning into a swan.

Aliberti thanked Waitrose for changing the packaging in another tweet Tuesday.

A Twitter user questioned why Waitrose had chosen to call the darkest duckling 'Ugly.' The story features an unfortunate young duckling who is bullied by all of those around him before turning into a swan. 'We are very sorry for any upset caused by the name of this product, it was absolutely not our intention to cause any offence,' reads the statement. 'We removed the product from sale several weeks ago while we changed the labeling and our ducklings are now back on sale.' One possible explanation for the naming is a reference to the Hans Christian Andersen fairytale 'The Ugly Duckling.' Waitrose has since apologized in a short statement seen by CNN. The 'Waitrose Trio of Chocolate Easter Ducklings' contains a white, milk and dark chocolate version, which were named 'Fluffy,' 'Crispy' and 'Ugly' respectively. The 'Waitrose Trio of Chocolate Easter Ducklings' contains a white, milk and dark chocolate version, which were named 'Fluffy,' 'Crispy' and 'Ugly' respectively. A Twitter user questioned why Waitrose had chosen to call the darkest duckling 'Ugly.' Aliberti thanked Waitrose for changing the packaging in another tweet Tuesday. The 'Waitrose Trio of Chocolate Easter Ducklings' contains a white, milk and dark chocolate version, which were named 'Fluffy,' 'Crispy' and 'Ugly' respectively. A Twitter user questioned why Waitrose had chosen to call the darkest duckling 'Ugly.' One possible explanation for the naming is a reference to the Hans Christian Andersen fairytale 'The Ugly Duckling.' One possible explanation for the naming is a reference to the Hans Christian Andersen fairytale 'The Ugly Duckling.' A Twitter user questioned why Waitrose had chosen to call the darkest duckling 'Ugly.' 'We removed the product from sale several weeks ago while we changed the labeling and our ducklings are now back on sale.' 'We are very sorry for any upset caused by the name of this product, it was absolutely not our intention to cause any offence,' reads the statement. 'We removed the product from sale several weeks ago while we changed the labeling and our ducklings are now back on sale.' The story features an unfortunate young duckling who is bullied by all of those around him before turning into a swan. A Twitter user questioned why Waitrose had chosen to call the darkest duckling 'Ugly.' A Twitter user questioned why Waitrose had chosen to call the darkest duckling 'Ugly.' One possible explanation for the naming is a reference to the Hans Christian Andersen fairytale 'The Ugly Duckling.' The 'Waitrose Trio of Chocolate Easter Ducklings' contains a white, milk and dark chocolate version, which were named 'Fluffy,' 'Crispy' and 'Ugly' respectively. 'Overheard women saying 'this is not right,' I agree, doesn't look good at all,' wrote Livia A. Aliberti on March 7. 'We are very sorry for any upset caused by the name of this product, it was absolutely not our intention to cause any offence,' reads the statement. A Twitter user questioned why Waitrose had chosen to call the darkest duckling 'Ugly.' The story features an unfortunate young duckling who is bullied by all of those around him before turning into a swan. The story features an unfortunate young duckling who is bullied by all of those around him before turning into a swan. 'We are very sorry for any upset caused by the name of this product, it was absolutely not our intention to cause any offence,' reads the statement. A Twitter user questioned why Waitrose had chosen to call the darkest duckling 'Ugly.' 'We are very sorry for any upset caused by the name of this product, it was absolutely not our intention to cause any offence,' reads the statement. One possible explanation for the naming is a reference to the Hans Christian Andersen fairytale 'The Ugly Duckling.' 'We are very sorry for any upset caused by the name of this product, it was absolutely not our intention to cause any offence,' reads the statement. 'We removed the product from sale several weeks ago while we changed the labeling and our ducklings are now back on sale.' The story features an unfortunate young duckling who is bullied by all of those around him before turning into a swan. Waitrose has since apologized in a short statement seen by CNN. Waitrose has since apologized in a short statement seen by CNN. Aliberti thanked Waitrose for changing the packaging in another tweet Tuesday. The story features an unfortunate young duckling who is bullied by all of those around him before turning into a swan. 'We removed the product from sale several weeks ago while we changed the labeling and our ducklings are now back on sale.'

#newsupdatenow