It makes sense to get informed about new programming paradigms and use them when appropriate. If object-oriented program

The most likely scenario is that object-oriented programming will stay around for another decade or so. Sure, the avant-garde is functional, but that doesn’t mean you should ditch object-oriented yet. It’s still incredibly good to have in your repertoire.

But characters make us feel. They give us someone to root for (or against). They develop and interact with the plot, molding themselves as they follow the yellow brick road of story direction.

More and more problems are coming up where functional programming is often the more efficient option. Think data analysis, machine learning, and parallel programming. The more you get into those fields, the more you’ll love functional programming.

The End… the elusive finish to your book. You might have an idea, but maybe you don’t. You might have a plan but it feels like you’re forcing your characters to follow a set path to the right when they really want to go left. Maybe to get there you have to force a character to do things they wouldn’t normally do.

Well, that’s a boring story. Character driven novels should force the character into the world you’ve built. Make them do something. They need to interact with the world and be immersed in activities that will help shape them.

Functional and object-oriented programmers alike, stop treating your paradigms like a religion. They’re tools, and they all have their use somewhere. What you use should only depend on what problems you are solving.

http://molos.bodasturias.com/jph/videos-vienna-capitals-v-black-wings-linz-v-at-at-1tzz-11.php

http://main.ruicasa.com/tjb/videos-Kobenhavn-Handbold-Horsens-HK-v-en-gb-1azz-.php

http://molos.bodasturias.com/jph/videos-vienna-capitals-v-black-wings-linz-v-at-at-1fmz-13.php

http://elta.actiup.com/mbu/v-ideos-herning-blue-fox-v-herlev-eagles-v-da-da-1dij-9.php

http://www.ectp.org/mdt/Video-EHC-Biel-Fribourg-Gotteron-v-en-gb-iok-.php

http://main.ruicasa.com/tjb/videos-Kobenhavn-Handbold-Horsens-HK-v-en-gb-1vcl30122020-20.php

http://main.ruicasa.com/tjb/v-ideos-Kobenhavn-Handbold-Horsens-HK-v-en-gb-1hdy-7.php

http://elta.actiup.com/mbu/video-herning-blue-fox-v-herlev-eagles-v-da-da-1wpz-28.php

http://www.ectp.org/mdt/v-ideos-EHC-Biel-Fribourg-Gotteron-v-en-gb-edg-.php

http://elta.actiup.com/mbu/v-ideos-stavanger-oilers-v-valerengens-v-no-no-1hze-20.php

http://main.ruicasa.com/tjb/video-tsmokі-mіnsk-v-cholet-basket-v-fr-fr-1ttw-3.php

http://main.ruicasa.com/tjb/v-ideos-tsmokі-mіnsk-v-cholet-basket-v-fr-fr-1ekx-5.php

http://elta.actiup.com/mbu/video-stavanger-oilers-v-valerengens-v-no-no-1wob-12.php

http://main.ruicasa.com/tjb/video-tsmokі-mіnsk-v-cholet-basket-v-fr-fr-1egj-20.php

http://elta.actiup.com/mbu/v-ideos-stavanger-oilers-v-valerengens-v-no-no-1jrx-29.php

http://www.ectp.org/mdt/v-ideos-EHC-Biel-Fribourg-Gotteron-v-en-gb-ygp-.php

http://main.ruicasa.com/tjb/v-ideos-tsmokі-mіnsk-v-cholet-basket-v-fr-fr-1wuv-21.php

http://elta.actiup.com/mbu/v-ideos-stavanger-oilers-v-valerengens-v-no-no-1igi-1.php

http://elta.actiup.com/mbu/video-Baskonia-Alba-Berlin-v-en-gb-1lxu-.php

http://elta.actiup.com/mbu/video-Baskonia-Alba-Berlin-v-en-gb-1qzr30122020-12.php

be defining our first state-space model in this article, the deterministic level model. It is the simplest one that we could possibly design. So simple that we can’t solve any real problem with it. Nonetheless, it is a state-space model. It belongs to the local level models bucket of the state space models. In our current context, the level is equivalent to what an intercept is for linear regression. This is why we call it deterministic: it means that the level is static — i.e., applied globally to all time points.

Characters have to interact with the plot, otherwise we’d just have awesome people doing normal stuff. There’d be no conflict, nothing to develop the character. That’s why we throw in plot, obstacles, and consequences to action. Those things help mold the character into who they will be at the end.

Readers don’t want flawless characters. They would pass through the story without any issues, fighting the bad guy and prevailing on the first try. No, readers want to connect with the characters and become emotionally invested.

How does that happen? Realistic characters that have flaws and display unique personalities. Readers want to see themselves in the character. They want to imagine they are going through the same challenges and finding their own inner strength. They see someone they love and they want to root for the character that displays similar characteristics and emotions.

There comes a point where your characters might have a better grasp on their own story than you do. Here are some ways to help you write character driven stories, or better yet, hand over the reigns of writing to your characters and give them power over where things will end up.

Man must go outside to put the trash away or get groceries. He makes it to the store without seeing a single bird (yay), but on his way out, a bird flies overhead. Does he drop the groceries and run? Does he use the food to defend himself? What interactions will he take to either withdraw or grow as a person?

At the end of the day, the — admittedly rather heated — debate of functional versus object-oriented programming boils down to this: could we be reaching the end of the era of object-oriented programming?

The most likely scenario is that object-oriented programming will stay around for another decade or so. Sure, the avant-garde is functional, but that doesn’t mean you should ditch object-oriented yet. It’s still incredibly good to have in your repertoire.

But if you look at the status quo, there are a dozen offers for object-oriented programmers to one offer for functional coders. That doesn’t mean you won’t get a job if you prefer the latter; functional developers are still pretty scarce these days.