Not only do I get to “choose Linux”, I get to choose the distribution of Linux I use — and that has changed over time. L

Unfortunately the core security of Windows is, and has always been pretty awful — with the continual need to run firewalls and virus killers to protect every single Windows machine from outside influence. Perhaps more worryingly, due to poor design the performance of all computers running Windows reduces over time — registry bloat, DLL hell, and wreckage from past updates are a continual source of frustration for home users and system administrators.

That I have ended up using Linux as a desktop operating system at home has happened mostly by accident. I will happily use anything that “just works” — and by-and-large the more well known Linux distributions do just that — they “just work” — without endless updates, drivers, security patches, reboots, and so on.

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/Video-cagliari-v-benevento-v-it-it-1niq2-2.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/Video-sparta-praha-v-mfk-chrudim-v-cs-cs-1nks-15.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/Video-sparta-praha-v-mfk-chrudim-v-cs-cs-1slq-1.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/Video-sparta-praha-v-mfk-chrudim-v-cs-cs-1zhq-22.php

http://svt.munich.es/fmi/video-ağri-1970-spor-v-ceyhan-v-tr-tr-1llc-13.php

http://svt.munich.es/fmi/Video-ağri-1970-spor-v-ceyhan-v-tr-tr-1ocl-5.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/Video-Gor-Mahia-Belouizdad-v-en-gb-ufv-.php

http://svt.munich.es/fmi/v-ideos-ağri-1970-spor-v-ceyhan-v-tr-tr-1hdi-11.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/videos-Gor-Mahia-Belouizdad-v-en-gb-bjf30122020-.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/Video-Gor-Mahia-Belouizdad-v-en-gb-xzb-.php

http://svt.munich.es/fmi/v-ideos-ağri-1970-spor-v-ceyhan-v-tr-tr-1kqw-13.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/video-zbrojovka-brno-v-wsg-wattens-v-cs-cs-1rwg-14.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/videos-zbrojovka-brno-v-wsg-wattens-v-cs-cs-1dae-1.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/video-zbrojovka-brno-v-wsg-wattens-v-cs-cs-1xgh-7.php

http://m.dentisalut.com/omy/Video-kirklarelispor-v-tarsus-idman-yurdu-v-tr-tr-1tnb-26.php

http://m.dentisalut.com/omy/videos-kirklarelispor-v-tarsus-idman-yurdu-v-tr-tr-1lvr-12.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/Video-Apollon-Smyrnis-Panathinaikos-v-en-gb-kuu-.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/Video-Apollon-Smyrnis-Panathinaikos-v-en-gb-nwm30122020-.php

http://agro.ruicasa.com/vtm/Video-Apollon-Smyrnis-Panathinaikos-v-en-gb-hly-.php

http://m.dentisalut.com/omy/videos-kirklarelispor-v-tarsus-idman-yurdu-v-tr-tr-1xnb-9.php

fe fell apart I dared to dream of a life where I could take my dark past and use it to help others with their future. I didn’t know how. I hadn’t discovered the vehicle to the destination which became writing. But I made a conscious decision to imagine what was possible, rather than spend 100% of my time in the present.

At a lower level, it’s perhaps worth noting that MacOS/OSX was originally based on Mach — a micro-kernel — the polar opposite of Linux. Micro kernel operating systems work by reducing core operating system functionality to control of messaging between services that do all the real work — which makes each service simple, but makes management of messaging enormously complicated, and causes all manner of design, functionality, and stability trade-offs.

Not only do I get to “choose Linux”, I get to choose the distribution of Linux I use — and that has changed over time. Last week I ran “Manjaro”, the week before that “Elementary OS”, and before that “Ubuntu”. I’m back using Ubuntu this week. I may change again next week — it’s a little like re-building your house again and again, with no appreciable loss or gain in core functionality. Of course, you get nothing done, but that’s not the point.

Thankfully Matt Mullenweg and Mike Little then forked a much better blogging script, and renamed it “Wordpress”. I wasn’t bitter — I never set out to manage a project after all — and I switched to Wordpress almost overnight.

Linux originally borrowed the design of Unix, which set out some simple but powerful underlying concepts around the treatment of all applications as processes — with standard input and output streams. It’s a game changing design that’s beyond the scope of this post, and not followed by either Windows or MacOS.

I titled this post “Choosing Linux”, and have sat on the fence throughout the entire monologue so far — being annoyingly even handed. I suppose when it comes down to it, the main reason I choose to use Linux outside of work is because I have to use Windows at work. The anarchic voice that occasionally whispers in my ear and causes me to walk to my own beat tells me that Linux is a good idea. It’s really that simple, and that illogical.

Linux famously has no central control over future direction — it has been, and always will be designed and developed by a disparate community. This can be seen as both a good, and a bad thing — good because the system is not forced in a direction by external actors, and bad because it causes fragmentation. The fragmentation also causes duplication of effort — with different teams building alternative versions of the same core functionality — everything from window managers, to text editors. This of course means more choice though, and a properly functioning ecosystem of sorts — with evolution, and natural selection in play.

While it’s true that the various things I have done outside of work could have been done on any operating system, I chose to do them in Linux mostly because it was free, and it almost worked as a turn-key solution — providing a platform on which I could tinker with the things I was interested in. Linux came with a great webserver (Apache), a great database (MySQL), and a simple web scripting language (PHP).

Linux differs from both Windows and MacOS in that it’s a constellation of software development projects built by a vast community, rather than a commercial product developed by one entity. Books have been written about this arrangement — perhaps the most famous being “The Cathedral and the Bazaar”. If Tim Berner’s “World Wide Web” was “for everybody”, then the same is probably true of Linux. The source code of every part of the core operating system and it’s supporting applications is freely available to copy, re-use, extend, enhance, and adapt — leading to ports for just about every hardware platform imaginable.

MacOS benefits from Apple both creating hardware and software — meaning the performance of the user interface in relation to the hardware is very good. You might also claim however that Apple are more concerned with how things look, than how well they work. Unfortunately MacOS only runs (reliably) on Apple hardware — while you can build a “Hackintosh”, you will face numerous problems with device drivers and core operating system stability. The software is driven — by design — by the Apple hardware renewal cycle. It’s easy to forget that Apple are a hardware company — it’s in their interest to obsolete existing hardware over time in order to sell it to you again, and again — and to discourage you from trying to run their software on anybody else’s hardware.

We read the source code and the comments on it, fixed memory leaks, and experimented with the possibilities in the usage of React-Native. Eventually, we saw success in migrating one of the most complex pages with no performance degradation.

Windows is ubiquitous — there is almost no learning curve, because everybody is familiar with how the user interface works. Because of it’s ubiquity, Windows won the battle for hearts and minds of businesses decades ago. There are signs this might change soon, but don’t hold your breath. Because of its ubiquity, hardware device drivers are widely available for most recent versions of Windows. You can almost always get any piece of hardware to work with Windows.

I suppose it’s important to note that I never used Linux “because it was Linux”. Linux wasn’t “the thing”. Linux was “the thing that got me to the thing” — a phrase that I believe lots of people have used over the years, and that fits my story well.