The Hollywood star is attempting to topple a dooming High Court Golden Heards case that she gave

Golden Heard's foundation vow 'determined and manipulative untruth', Johnny Depp says 

Golden Heard's case that she gave her 7,000,000 US dollar (£5.5 million) separate from settlement to good cause was a "determined and manipulative falsehood", Johnny Depp's attorneys have told the Court of Allure. 

The Hollywood star is attempting to topple a dooming High Court deciding that he attacked his ex and put her in dread for her life, and is requesting the Court from Appeal to arrange a retrial of his criticism guarantee against The Sun. 

Following a three-week preliminary in July a year ago, Mr Equity Nicol decided that Mr Depp, 57, attacked Ms Heard, 34, on twelve events and put her in "dread for her life" multiple times. 

The adjudicator tracked down that an April 2018 section considering Mr Depp a "tank top" was "generously obvious". 

Be that as it may, the entertainer claims he "didn't get a reasonable preliminary" and is applying for authorization to bid against the decision at the Imperial Official courtrooms in London on Thursday. 

His advodate Andrew Caldecott QC applied for consent to depend on "new proof" that Ms Heard didn't give her separation settlement to noble cause. 

After the couple separated in 2016, Ms Heard said she would part the 7,000,000 US dollars between the Youngsters' Emergency clinic Los Angeles and the American Common Freedoms Association (ACLU). 

In any case, Mr Caldecott said, the clinic kept in touch with Mr Depp's business counsel in 2019 to say Ms Heard had not made "any installments". 

The court heard she gave only 100,000 dollars (£72,000) to the emergency clinic and 450,000 dollars (£322,000) to the ACLU, despite the fact that she asserts she earned anything (£358,000) gift to the second foundation namelessly. 

In composed entries, Mr Caldecott said the promises "fortified Ms Heard's credit in an outstanding way". 

Yet, he added, that was a "determined and manipulative untruth, intended to accomplish an intense ideal impression from the start". 

In November, Mr Equity Nicol dismissed Mr Depp's dispute that Ms Heard was a "gold-digger", saying in his decision: "Her gift of the 7,000,000 US dollars to good cause is not really the demonstration one would expect of a gold-digger." 

Mr Caldecott contended that the if "reality with regards to the cause guarantee arose at the preliminary, it would have substantially influenced Mr Equity Nicol's thought of Ms Heard's proof all in all". 

He said: "The proof introduced an entirely outstanding demonstration of charity, which would have profoundly dazzled any sensible individual. 

"Her public assertions explicitly expressed that the ACLU gift had casualties of abusive behavior at home explicitly as a top priority. 

"The subconscious cue of the foundation guarantee was in any occasion clear: Ms Heard would not wish to keep any of Mr Depp's cash, since he had exposed her to genuine savagery. 

"The proof introduced, and was clearly planned to introduce, her in the most grounded terms as both idealistic and a casualty." 

Mr Caldecott said Mr Depp "had his doubts about Ms Heard's proof" at the hour of the preliminary, "yet he had no proof to help them". 

The advodate added: "Ms Heard found a way every accessible way to stifle the proof." 

Adam Wolanski QC, addressing the Sun's distributer News Gathering Papers (NGN), said in composed entries that Mr Depp's "new proof" was said to help "a hypothesis that Ms Heard was a 'gold-digger'". 

In any case, he said, "the proof isn't 'new' in any way, since it might have been acquired with sensible perseverance for (the) preliminary". 

Mr Wolanski added: "The 'new' proof – which the respondents acknowledge is evidently valid to the extent that it shows that Ms Heard has not yet wrapped up making her vowed installments to the foundations – just goes to an exceptionally fringe and unpleaded matter and is of no pertinence to the argued issues, for example the 14 attacks, that Mr Equity Nicol needed to choose. 

"The proof would no affect Ms Heard's validity had it been under the watchful eye of the preliminary adjudicator, since it doesn't exhibit that Ms Heard or any of the respondents' observers lied." 

She told the court: "The application to concede the proof ought to in this way be denied … (and) the application for consent to allure ought to be excused." 

Mr Depp sued NGN in June 2018 over the segment by the paper's leader proofreader Dan Wootton, which alluded to "overpowering proof" he assaulted Ms Heard. 

In his judgment, Mr Equity Nicol reasoned that 12 of the 14 asserted occurrences of abusive behavior at home depended on by NGN with all due respect of the entertainer's case happened. 

The adjudicator likewise discovered Mr Depp put Ms Heard in "dread for her life" on three events, including one the entertainer depicted as a "three-day prisoner circumstance" in Australia in Walk 2015. 

Yet, Mr Depp's legitimate group claims Mr Equity Nicol "neglected to analyze the contending records of every episode, or to clarify whether he discovered them demonstrated and, provided that this is true, on what premise". 

They additionally contend "the adjudicator ought to have broke down the degree to which Ms Heard's proof sabotaged her believability comparable to her charges of actual attack/injury". 

Only days after the decision in November, Mr Depp reported he had been asked by Warner Siblings to leave his job in the Harry Potter spin-off establishment Awesome Monsters – the very job which incited Mr Wootton to ask how JK Rowling could be "really cheerful" Mr Depp was projected in the film. 

Mr Depp is entangled in a different criticism fight in the US, having sued Ms Heard by and by over a 2018 Washington Post assessment piece in which she professed to be a survivor of homegrown maltreatment however didn't specify the entertainer by name. 

Mr Wolanski said the entertainer carried the application to offer the High Court administering to advance his situation in the US preliminary "by proceeding freely to malign the apparently "unjust" English legitimate interaction, in any event until after the US preliminary has finished up". 

The entertainer's 50 million dollar (£35 million) US argument against Ms Heard was as of late deferred until April 2022. 

The Court of Allure hearing, which is being livestreamed on the court's YouTube channel, is expected to finish up on Thursday. 

It is yet not known whether Ruler Equity Underhill and Master Equity Dingemans will give a decision on Thursday, or save their choice to a later date.

Amber Heard's charity pledge ‘calculated and manipulative lie', Johnny Depp says
Amber Heard’s claim that she gave her seven million US dollar (£5.5 million) divorce settlement to charity was a “calculated and manipulative lie”, Johnny Depp’s lawyers have told the Court of Appeal.

The Hollywood star is trying to overturn a damning High Court ruling that he assaulted his ex-wife and put her in fear for her life, and is asking the Court of Appeal to order a retrial of his libel claim against The Sun.

Following a three-week trial in July last year, Mr Justice Nicol ruled that Mr Depp, 57, assaulted Ms Heard, 34, on a dozen occasions and put her in “fear for her life” three times.

The judge found that an April 2018 column calling Mr Depp a “wife beater” was “substantially true”.

But the actor claims he “did not receive a fair trial” and is applying for permission to appeal against the ruling at the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Thursday.

His barrister Andrew Caldecott QC applied for permission to rely on “fresh evidence” that Ms Heard did not donate her divorce settlement to charity.

After the couple divorced in 2016, Ms Heard said she would split the seven million US dollars between the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

But, Mr Caldecott said, the hospital wrote to Mr Depp’s business adviser in 2019 to say Ms Heard had not made “any payments”.

The court heard she gave just 100,000 dollars (£72,000) to the hospital and 450,000 dollars (£322,000) to the ACLU, although she claims she made a further 500,000 dollar (£358,000) donation to the second charity anonymously.

In written submissions, Mr Caldecott said the pledges “strengthened Ms Heard’s credit in an exceptional way”.

But, he added, that was a “calculated and manipulative lie, designed to achieve a potent favourable impression from the outset”.

In November, Mr Justice Nicol rejected Mr Depp’s contention that Ms Heard was a “gold-digger”, saying in his ruling: “Her donation of the seven million US dollars to charity is hardly the act one would expect of a gold-digger.”

https://usmpvirtual.instructure.com/eportfolios/189/Pgina_de_Inicio/TW___HD_
https://nfte.instructure.com/eportfolios/7416/Home/ZH___Five_Feet_Apart_4K_
https://newarka.instructure.com/eportfolios/1717/Home/__Five_Feet_Apart_HD_
https://newarka.instructure.com/eportfolios/1718/Home/__Persian_Lessons_HD_
https://nfte.instructure.com/eportfolios/7420/Home/ZH___Persian_Lessons_4K_
https://usmpvirtual.instructure.com/eportfolios/191/Pgina_de_Inicio/TW_4K___HD_
https://sotc.instructure.com/eportfolios/30750/Home/_2021
https://newarka.instructure.com/eportfolios/1721/Home/__Overall_Planning_HD_
https://nfte.instructure.com/eportfolios/7427/Home/ZH___Overall_Planning_4K_
https://sotc.instructure.com/eportfolios/30780/Home/TW_4K___HD_
https://usmpvirtual.instructure.com/eportfolios/192/Pgina_de_Inicio/HD___Overall_Planning_UHD__1080p
https://slee.instructure.com/eportfolios/189/Home/4K___Overall_Planning_
https://nfte.instructure.com/eportfolios/7556/Home/__Promising_Young_Woman_2021_HD4K_
https://newarka.instructure.com/eportfolios/1841/Home/ZH___Promising_Young_Woman_4K_2021_
https://slee.instructure.com/eportfolios/192/Home/TW_4K___HD_
https://sotc.instructure.com/eportfolios/30925/Home/HD__2021
https://nfte.instructure.com/eportfolios/7799/Home/__Breaking_News_in_Yuba_County_2021_HD4K_
https://newarka.instructure.com/eportfolios/2025/Home/ZH___Breaking_News_in_Yuba_County_4K_2021_
https://slee.instructure.com/eportfolios/196/Home/TW_4K___HD_
https://sotc.instructure.com/eportfolios/31100/Home/HD__2021
https://newarka.instructure.com/eportfolios/2045/Home/__Nomadland_2021_HD4K_
https://nfte.instructure.com/eportfolios/7876/Home/ZH___Nomadland_4K_2021_
https://slee.instructure.com/eportfolios/198/Home/TW_4K___HD_
https://sotc.instructure.com/eportfolios/31153/Home/HD__2021
https://newarka.instructure.com/eportfolios/2068/Home/__Nobody_2021_HD4K_
https://nfte.instructure.com/eportfolios/7917/Home/ZH___Nobody_4K_2021_
https://sotc.instructure.com/eportfolios/31228/Home/TW_4K___HD_
https://slee.instructure.com/eportfolios/201/Home/HD__2021
https://www.guest-articles.com/sports/kl-rahul-remains-the-top-ranked-indian-batsmen-nd-vs-eng-live-score-suryakumar-yadav-scintillating-18-03-2021
https://www.guest-articles.com/education/shreyas-iyer-is-up