Court rules insurers dont have to pay for Viagra

Insurers in Germany are not obligated to pay for Viagra or other sexual performance enhancing drugs, the country's federal social court has ruled.

The decision Tuesday stemmed from the case of a man with multiple sclerosis who insisted his insurance company reimburse him for the cost of treating his erectile dysfunction, a potential side effect of the neurological disease.

But the court ruled that insurers have no responsibility to pay for any 'quality of life' drugs and that an insurer's refusal to do so was in no way discriminatory, even if the person in question suffered from an incurable disease.



https://crafterdepot.com/crafter-depot-groups/zip-downloadmp3-the-struts-young-dangerous-album-download/
https://crafterdepot.com/crafter-depot-groups/downloadmp3-puerto-candelaria-the-secret-of-the-shadow-album-download/
https://crafterdepot.com/crafter-depot-groups/download-album-bop-perehod-ep-zip-mp3/


During the proceedings, defendants cited reforms to the country's health care system that were pushed through in 2004, under which insurance companies were exempt from paying for medication that primarily treated 'quality of life' conditions. The list included medicines for treating impotence.

Insurers in Germany are not obligated to pay for Viagra or other sexual performance enhancing drugs, the country's federal social court has ruled. But the court ruled that insurers have no responsibility to pay for any 'quality of life' drugs and that an insurer's refusal to do so was in no way discriminatory, even if the person in question suffered from an incurable disease. The decision Tuesday stemmed from the case of a man with multiple sclerosis who insisted his insurance company reimburse him for the cost of treating his erectile dysfunction, a potential side effect of the neurological disease. But the court ruled that insurers have no responsibility to pay for any 'quality of life' drugs and that an insurer's refusal to do so was in no way discriminatory, even if the person in question suffered from an incurable disease. During the proceedings, defendants cited reforms to the country's health care system that were pushed through in 2004, under which insurance companies were exempt from paying for medication that primarily treated 'quality of life' conditions. The list included medicines for treating impotence. The decision Tuesday stemmed from the case of a man with multiple sclerosis who insisted his insurance company reimburse him for the cost of treating his erectile dysfunction, a potential side effect of the neurological disease. But the court ruled that insurers have no responsibility to pay for any 'quality of life' drugs and that an insurer's refusal to do so was in no way discriminatory, even if the person in question suffered from an incurable disease. The decision Tuesday stemmed from the case of a man with multiple sclerosis who insisted his insurance company reimburse him for the cost of treating his erectile dysfunction, a potential side effect of the neurological disease. The decision Tuesday stemmed from the case of a man with multiple sclerosis who insisted his insurance company reimburse him for the cost of treating his erectile dysfunction, a potential side effect of the neurological disease. The decision Tuesday stemmed from the case of a man with multiple sclerosis who insisted his insurance company reimburse him for the cost of treating his erectile dysfunction, a potential side effect of the neurological disease. During the proceedings, defendants cited reforms to the country's health care system that were pushed through in 2004, under which insurance companies were exempt from paying for medication that primarily treated 'quality of life' conditions. The list included medicines for treating impotence. During the proceedings, defendants cited reforms to the country's health care system that were pushed through in 2004, under which insurance companies were exempt from paying for medication that primarily treated 'quality of life' conditions. The list included medicines for treating impotence. During the proceedings, defendants cited reforms to the country's health care system that were pushed through in 2004, under which insurance companies were exempt from paying for medication that primarily treated 'quality of life' conditions. The list included medicines for treating impotence. During the proceedings, defendants cited reforms to the country's health care system that were pushed through in 2004, under which insurance companies were exempt from paying for medication that primarily treated 'quality of life' conditions. The list included medicines for treating impotence. Insurers in Germany are not obligated to pay for Viagra or other sexual performance enhancing drugs, the country's federal social court has ruled. The decision Tuesday stemmed from the case of a man with multiple sclerosis who insisted his insurance company reimburse him for the cost of treating his erectile dysfunction, a potential side effect of the neurological disease. During the proceedings, defendants cited reforms to the country's health care system that were pushed through in 2004, under which insurance companies were exempt from paying for medication that primarily treated 'quality of life' conditions. The list included medicines for treating impotence. But the court ruled that insurers have no responsibility to pay for any 'quality of life' drugs and that an insurer's refusal to do so was in no way discriminatory, even if the person in question suffered from an incurable disease. The decision Tuesday stemmed from the case of a man with multiple sclerosis who insisted his insurance company reimburse him for the cost of treating his erectile dysfunction, a potential side effect of the neurological disease. But the court ruled that insurers have no responsibility to pay for any 'quality of life' drugs and that an insurer's refusal to do so was in no way discriminatory, even if the person in question suffered from an incurable disease.

#newsupdatenow